
GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌155.8% higher power demand at 110W vs 43W.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
2025Why buy it
- ✅107.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 110W, a 67W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.7% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.


Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,553 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti scores 2,525 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G reaches 2,553 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,525 | 2,553+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+1057% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 512 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti draws 110W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G's 43W — a 87.6% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 300W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 43W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 300W-25% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 23.0 | 59.4+158% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti came in at $149, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti was 50.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.9 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 8.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 98.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G (2025 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9+99% | 8.5 |
| Codename | GK106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #633 | #229 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















