GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 950M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 950M

2015

Why buy it

✅11.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 950M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (2,575 vs 2,525), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 950M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 950M

The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti scores 2,525 and the GeForce GTX 950M reaches 2,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 950M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950M). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 950M
G3D Mark Score	2,525	2,575+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.425 TFLOPS	1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	64 KB	320 KB+400%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 950M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 950M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti draws 110W versus the GeForce GTX 950M's 75W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 950M
TDP	110W	75W-32%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	23.0	34.3+49%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950M (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 950M
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	GK106	GM107
Release	October 9 2012	March 13 2015
Ranking	#633	#626

Search GeForce GTX 650 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 950M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.