
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌134.9% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌134.9% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 5 150 better than GeForce GTX 650 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 650 Ti make more sense than Radeon Ryzen 5 150?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Radeon Ryzen 5 150

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.


Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti scores 2,525 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,525 | 2,595+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS+18% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti draws 110W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 75% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 50W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 23.0 | 51.9+126% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 launched at $350. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti costs 57.4% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.9 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 7.4 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 128.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-57% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9+128% | 7.4 |
| Codename | GK106 | Lexa |
| Release | October 9 2012 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #633 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














