GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Radeon Pro WX 3100
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅7.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 13.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 168mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
Radeon Pro WX 3100
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 650 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.6% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌15.9% longer card at 168mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti scores 2,525 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 reaches 2,584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,525 | 2,584+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS+14% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3100. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3100) — the Radeon Pro WX 3100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti draws 110W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 65W — a 51.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 65W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.0 | 39.8+73% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti came in at $149, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti was 25.1% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.9 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 13.0 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 30% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3100 (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9+30% | 13.0 |
| Codename | GK106 | Lexa |
| Release | October 9 2012 | June 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #633 | #624 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 3100
