
Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GeForce RTX 2060

Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S80
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 0). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 461.6% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S80.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-461.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+461.6%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $170 for the Moore Threads MTT S80, it costs 29% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 695.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+695.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S80 and GeForce RTX 2060
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Moore Threads MTT S80 scores 2,513 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 461.6%. The Moore Threads MTT S80 is built on MUSA while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,513 | 14,114+462% |
| Architecture | MUSA | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+113% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+129% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 256+433% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256+113% | 120 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S80 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S80 draws 255W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 45.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 255W | 160W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 88.2+791% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260 MSRP and currently averages $170, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 29.4% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.8 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 694.6% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $260-26% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $120-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 117.6+695% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | TU106 |
| Release | sem dados | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #635 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















