Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GeForce RTX 4070
Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S80
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 0). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 971.2% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S80.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-971.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+971.2%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $170), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 231.1% better value per dollar than the Moore Threads MTT S80.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+231.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($170) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S80 and GeForce RTX 4070
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Moore Threads MTT S80 scores 2,513 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 971.2%. The Moore Threads MTT S80 is built on MUSA while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,513 | 26,919+971% |
| Architecture | MUSA | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 5888+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+98% |
| ROPs | 256+300% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+39% | 184 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S80 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S80 draws 255W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 24.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 255W | 200W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 304mm |
| Height | 112mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 134.6+1260% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260 MSRP and currently averages $170, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Moore Threads MTT S80 costs 69.1% less ($380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.8 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 230.4% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $260-57% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170-69% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 48.9+230% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | AD104 |
| Release | sem dados | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #635 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S80 and GeForce RTX 4070
