N150 vs Xeon X5687

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

N150 vs Xeon X5687 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

N150 vs Xeon X5687: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

N150

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1366 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5687 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5687, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.

Xeon X5687

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,386 vs 5,418).
❌Launch MSRP is still $552 MSRP, while N150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1366, while N150 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5687 better than N150?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5687 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while N150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, N150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5687 is the better buy right now. Xeon X5687 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $552 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that N150 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2011), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1366, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

N150 vs Xeon X5687 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

N150

The N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5687

The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.

⚡

Processing Power

The N150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5687's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the N150 versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5687. The Xeon X5687 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the N150 scores 5,418 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 0.6% lead for the N150. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N150 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5687.

Feature	N150	Xeon X5687
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.86 GHz+7%
Base Clock	—	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	—	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,418	5,386
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,643
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,386

🧠

Memory & Platform

The N150 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon X5687 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	N150	Xeon X5687
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	288 GB
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	36