Opteron 140
VS
Athlon 64 2800+

Opteron 140 vs Athlon 64 2800+

AMD

Opteron 140

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 140 is positioned at rank 849 and the Athlon 64 2800+ is on rank 1098, so the Opteron 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 140

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19423%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3667%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3258%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2517%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
100%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
100%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
99%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
98%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
98%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
97%
#849
Opteron 140
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#851
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
99%
#856
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#858
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#860
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
97%
#861
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
96%
#862
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2800+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
132083%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
124805%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
90619%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
27300%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
21624%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
18917%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
10835%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
10693%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
9736%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
9736%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
9627%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
9367%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
9236%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
9199%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9115%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
100%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
97%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
95%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
92%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
89%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
83%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
81%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
79%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
78%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
76%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
71%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
67%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
62%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
61%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
59%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon 64 2800+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Opteron 140 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 140Athlon 64 2800+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NewCastle (2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 140Athlon 64 2800+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 140 and Athlon 64 2800+

AMD

Opteron 140

The Opteron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $596.

AMD

Athlon 64 2800+

The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 140 and Athlon 64 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Opteron 140 versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ — a 25% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 2800+. The Opteron 140 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon 64 2800+ uses NewCastle (2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 140 scores 428 against the Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 1.9% lead for the Opteron 140. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 140Athlon 64 2800+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
1.8 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
NewCastle (2004)
PassMark
428+2%
420
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 140 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2800+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 140Athlon 64 2800+
Socket
940
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0