Opteron 140
Pentium M 730
Opteron 140 vs Pentium M 730 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron 140 vs Pentium M 730 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Opteron 140 vs Pentium M 730: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron 140
2003Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (428 vs 435).
- ❌214.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 27W.
Pentium M 730
2005Why buy it
- ✅Draws 27W instead of 85W, a 58W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium M 730 better than Opteron 140?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 140 vs Pentium M 730 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Opteron 140
The Opteron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $596.
Pentium M 730
The Pentium M 730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 140 and Pentium M 730 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Opteron 140 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 730 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Pentium M 730. The Opteron 140 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 730 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 140 scores 428 against the Pentium M 730's 435 — a 1.6% lead for the Pentium M 730. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 140 | Pentium M 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 90 nm-31% |
| Architecture | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 428 | 435+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 140 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 730 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 140 | Pentium M 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 940 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 140 and Pentium M 730
