
Opteron 140 vs Athlon XP 3200+

Opteron 140

Athlon XP 3200+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 140 is positioned at rank 849 and the Athlon XP 3200+ is on rank 1127, so the Opteron 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 140
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 3200+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 140 | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 140 | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 140 and Athlon XP 3200+

Opteron 140
The Opteron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $596.

Athlon XP 3200+
The Athlon XP 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 140 and Athlon XP 3200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Opteron 140 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3200+ — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3200+. The Opteron 140 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon XP 3200+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 140 scores 428 against the Athlon XP 3200+'s 445 — a 3.9% lead for the Athlon XP 3200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 140 | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| PassMark | 428 | 445+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 140 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 3200+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 140 | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 940 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















