Opteron 144
VS
Pentium M 750

Opteron 144 vs Pentium M 750

AMD

Opteron 144

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2003
VS
Intel

Pentium M 750

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 144 is positioned at rank 944 and the Pentium M 750 is on rank 131, so the Pentium M 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 144

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
29066%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5488%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4876%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3767%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
95%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
89%
#944
Opteron 144
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
100%
#945
Opteron 4386
MSRP: $459|Avg: $459
100%
#946
Xeon E5-2640
MSRP: $885|Avg: N/A
100%
#947
Xeon E5-2643 v4
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $555
99%
#949
Xeon E5-2630 v2
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1224
98%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
92%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
90%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
89%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 750

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
95%
#119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
302%
#120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
298%
#121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
274%
#122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
272%
#123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
270%
#125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
261%
#126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
250%
#127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
249%
#128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
243%
#131
Pentium M 750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
98%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium M 750 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Opteron 144 in both compute-intensive tasks (4.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightOpteron 144Pentium M 750
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($29)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 144Pentium M 750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($29)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 144 and Pentium M 750

AMD

Opteron 144

The Opteron 144 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $65.

Intel

Pentium M 750

The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 144 and Pentium M 750 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Opteron 144 versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Pentium M 750. The Opteron 144 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 750 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 144 scores 465 against the Pentium M 750's 485 — a 4.2% lead for the Pentium M 750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 144Pentium M 750
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
1.86 GHz+3%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
465
485+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 144 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 144Pentium M 750
Socket
940
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Opteron 144) / not specified (Pentium M 750). Primary use case: Opteron 144 targets Server Legacy.

FeatureOpteron 144Pentium M 750
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Server Legacy