Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 144

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 144 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

1 / 2

475

+2.2%

465

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 144 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 144: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

2003

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 85W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Opteron 144

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (465 vs 475).
❌Launch MSRP is still $65 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌21.4% higher power demand at 85W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 better than Opteron 144?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 144 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 70.6% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 144 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $65 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.2% higher PassMark. Opteron 144 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 144 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 144

The Opteron 144 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $65.

⚡

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Opteron 144's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 versus 1.8 GHz on the Opteron 144 — a 52.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 144 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 scores 475 against the Opteron 144's 465 — a 2.1% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Mobile Pentium 4 3.06	Opteron 144
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.07 GHz+71%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark	475+2%	465

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 144 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.