Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 130

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

1 Cores2 Thrd70 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 130

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 130 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (475 vs 488).
    • 55.6% higher power demand at 70W vs 45W.

    Sempron 130

    2011

    Why buy it

    • +2.7% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 45W instead of 70W, a 25W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 130 better than Mobile Pentium 4 3.06?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 130 pulls ahead with 2.7% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 130 still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.7% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 130 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

    The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 130

    The Sempron 130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 488 points. Launch price was $25.

    Processing Power

    The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 130's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 versus 2.6 GHz on the Sempron 130 — a 16.6% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 130 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 scores 475 against the Sempron 130's 488 — a 2.7% lead for the Sempron 130. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Sempron 130
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    3.07 GHz+18%
    2.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    130 nm
    45 nm-65%
    Architecture
    Northwood (2002−2004)
    Sargas (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    475
    488+3%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 130 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Sempron 130
    Socket
    PGA478
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%