Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 3600+

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

1 Cores2 Thrd70 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 3600+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 3600+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 3600+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 3600+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (475 vs 485).

    Sempron 3600+

    2006

    Why buy it

    • +2.1% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 62W instead of 70W, a 8W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $105 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 3600+ better than Mobile Pentium 4 3.06?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3600+ pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3600+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 3600+ is the better buy right now. Sempron 3600+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $105 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 3600+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Sempron 3600+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

    The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 3600+

    The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.

    Processing Power

    The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3600+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3600+ — a 42.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3600+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 scores 475 against the Sempron 3600+'s 485 — a 2.1% lead for the Sempron 3600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Sempron 3600+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    3.07 GHz+53%
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+100%
    256K
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Northwood (2002−2004)
    Manila (2001−2006)
    PassMark
    475
    485+2%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Sempron 3600+
    Socket
    PGA478
    AM2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 3.06) / None (Sempron 3600+). Primary use case: Sempron 3600+ targets Budget.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Sempron 3600+
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    None
    Target Use
    Budget