Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 146

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

1 Cores2 Thrd70 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 146

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 146 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 146 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 146: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

2003

Why buy it

  • Draws 70W instead of 89W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 146 across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (475 vs 505).

Opteron 146

2003

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 27.1% higher power demand at 89W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 146 better than Mobile Pentium 4 3.06?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 146 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Opteron 146 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 146 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Opteron 146 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron 146 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 146 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Opteron 146 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron 146

The Opteron 146 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Opteron 146's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 versus 2 GHz on the Opteron 146 — a 42.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 146 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 scores 475 against the Opteron 146's 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Opteron 146. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Opteron 146
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3.07 GHz+53%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
Northwood (2002−2004)
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark
475
505+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 146 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Opteron 146
Socket
PGA478
940
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%