Celeron 900
VS
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

Celeron 900 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

VS
Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

1 Cores2 Thrd70 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 900 is positioned at rank 1193 and the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is on rank 673, so the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 900

#1181
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5202%
#1182
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5126%
#1183
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4706%
#1184
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4684%
#1185
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4641%
#1187
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4482%
#1188
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4298%
#1189
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4291%
#1190
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4176%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
100%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
99%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
95%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
90%
#1204
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
90%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
90%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
90%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
88%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

#661
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
926%
#662
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
913%
#663
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
838%
#664
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
834%
#665
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
827%
#667
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
798%
#668
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
765%
#669
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
764%
#670
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
744%
#673
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#681
Core i3-N305
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 900 (2009) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 900Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 900Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 900 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

Intel

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is built on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 900 scores 485 against the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06's 475 — a 2.1% lead for the Celeron 900. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900 vs 0 kB on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06.

FeatureCeleron 900Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
Boost Clock
3.07 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark
485+2%
475
Geekbench 6 Single
220
Geekbench 6 Multi
229
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureCeleron 900Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 900) / not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 3.06). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureCeleron 900Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget