PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 900 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 900 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 900

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 70W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 485).
❌100% higher power demand at 70W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 900 better than Mobile Pentium 4 3.06?

Yes. Celeron 900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 900 is the better buy right now. Celeron 900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2003). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 900 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is built on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 900 scores 485 against the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06's 475 — a 2.1% lead for the Celeron 900. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900 vs 0 kB on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06.

Feature	Celeron 900	Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 2
Boost Clock	—	3.07 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	512 kB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	—	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	485+2%	475
Geekbench 6 Single	220	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Celeron 900	Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 900) / not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 3.06). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.