Celeron 900 vs Sempron 130

Celeron 900 vs Sempron 130 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 900

485

0.0%

488

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 900 vs Sempron 130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 900 vs Sempron 130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 900

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (485 vs 488).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Sempron 130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 130

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 130 better than Celeron 900?

Yes. Sempron 130 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.6% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 130 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 0.6% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 130 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% higher PassMark. Celeron 900 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 900 vs Sempron 130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 130

The Sempron 130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 488 points. Launch price was $25.

⚡

Processing Power

The Sempron 130 is built on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 900 scores 485 against the Sempron 130's 488 — a 0.6% lead for the Sempron 130. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 130.

Feature	Celeron 900	Sempron 130
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	512 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	—	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	485	488
Geekbench 6 Single	220	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 130 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 900	Sempron 130
Socket	PGA478	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 900) / not specified (Sempron 130). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.