Celeron 900
VS
Turion 64 ML-30

Celeron 900 vs Turion 64 ML-30

VS
AMD

Turion 64 ML-30

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 900 is positioned at rank 1193 and the Turion 64 ML-30 is on rank 961, so the Turion 64 ML-30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 900

#1181
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5202%
#1182
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5126%
#1183
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4706%
#1184
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4684%
#1185
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4641%
#1187
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4482%
#1188
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4298%
#1189
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4291%
#1190
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4176%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
100%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
99%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
95%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
90%
#1204
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
90%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
90%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
90%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
88%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-30

#948
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1853%
#949
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1826%
#950
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1677%
#951
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1669%
#952
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1654%
#954
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1597%
#955
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1531%
#956
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1529%
#957
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1488%
#961
Turion 64 ML-30
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#962
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
99%
#967
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
97%
#969
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
96%
#970
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Turion 64 ML-30 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 900 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 900Turion 64 ML-30
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 900Turion 64 ML-30
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 900 and Turion 64 ML-30

Intel

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Turion 64 ML-30

The Turion 64 ML-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Turion 64 ML-30 is built on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 900 scores 485 against the Turion 64 ML-30's 475 — a 2.1% lead for the Celeron 900. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-30.

FeatureCeleron 900Turion 64 ML-30
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
45 nm-50%
90 nm
Architecture
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
485+2%
475
Geekbench 6 Single
220
Geekbench 6 Multi
229
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-30 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 900Turion 64 ML-30
Socket
PGA478
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 900) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-30). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureCeleron 900Turion 64 ML-30
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget