Celeron 560 vs Celeron 900

CPU

GPU

Celeron 560

31 WW2008

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 900

35 WW2009

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 560 vs Celeron 900 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 560

475

0.0%

485

+2.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 560 vs Celeron 900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 560 vs Celeron 900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 31W instead of 35W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 485).
❌
3.5% HIGHER MSRP
$89 MSRPvs$86 MSRP

Celeron 900

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $3 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 900 better than Celeron 560?

Yes. Celeron 900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.1% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 900 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 2.1% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 900 is the better buy right now. Celeron 900 comes in $3 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.1% higher PassMark. It is also 5.7% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 5.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 560 vs Celeron 900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 560

The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

In PassMark, the Celeron 560 scores 475 against the Celeron 900's 485 — a 2.1% lead for the Celeron 900. Both processors carry 1 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 900
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
PassMark	475	485+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	220
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	229

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 560 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 900 — the Celeron 900 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 560) vs 1 (Celeron 900). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Santa Rosa (Celeron 560) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 900).

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 900
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-1333+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support No virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget, Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310; Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 900
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	No
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 560 was priced at $89, while the Celeron 900 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($89 vs $86), Celeron 900 was $3 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 560 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Celeron 900 — making the Celeron 900 the 5.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 900
MSRP	$89	$86-3%
Performance per Dollar	5.3	5.6+6%
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Celeron 560 on Amazon

Search Celeron 900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.