Celeron 560
Sempron 3600+
Celeron 560 vs Sempron 3600+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 560 vs Sempron 3600+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 560 vs Sempron 3600+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 560
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $105 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $105 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 31W instead of 62W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 485).
Sempron 3600+
2006Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($105 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 62W vs 31W.
Quick Answers
So, is Sempron 3600+ better than Celeron 560?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 560 vs Sempron 3600+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron 560
The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 3600+
The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
The Sempron 3600+ is built on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 560 scores 475 against the Sempron 3600+'s 485 — a 2.1% lead for the Sempron 3600+. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 560 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Celeron 560 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.13 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K |
| Process | 65 nm-28% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | — | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 475 | 485+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 560 versus DDR2-800 on the Sempron 3600+ — the Sempron 3600+ supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 560) vs 1 (Sempron 3600+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Celeron 560 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR2-800+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 560) vs None (Sempron 3600+). Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget, Sempron 3600+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310.
| Feature | Celeron 560 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | None |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 560 was priced at $89, while the Sempron 3600+ came in at $105. On launch pricing ($89 vs $105), Celeron 560 was $16 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 560 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Sempron 3600+ — making the Celeron 560 the 14.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 560 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89-15% | $105 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3+15% | 4.6 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2006 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 560 and Sempron 3600+
