PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 560 vs Celeron 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 560 vs Celeron 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 505).

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 570 better than Celeron 560?

Yes. Celeron 570 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 570 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 570 comes in 50.6% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 560 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 41.6% better value on paper (5.3 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 570 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron 560 vs Celeron 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 560

The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

In PassMark, the Celeron 560 scores 475 against the Celeron 570's 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Celeron 570. Both processors carry 1 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 570
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.26 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache
Process	65 nm	65 nm
PassMark	475	505+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Santa Rosa (Celeron 560) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570).

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 570
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support No virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget, Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310; Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 570
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	No
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 560 was priced at $89, while the Celeron 570 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($89 vs $134), Celeron 560 was $45 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 560 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 3.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 570 — making the Celeron 560 the 34.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 560	Celeron 570
MSRP	$89-34%	$134
Performance per Dollar	5.3+39%	3.8
Release Date	2008	2008

Search Celeron 560 on Amazon

Search Celeron 570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.