Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Turion 64 MT-32

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Turion 64 MT-32 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

1 / 2

475

0.0%

505

+6.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Turion 64 MT-32 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Turion 64 MT-32: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

2003

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 512W, a 442W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion 64 MT-32 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 505).

Turion 64 MT-32

2005

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌631.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 MT-32 better than Mobile Pentium 4 3.06?

Yes. Turion 64 MT-32 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 MT-32 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-32 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 MT-32 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 MT-32 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 MT-32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Turion 64 MT-32 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 MT-32

The Turion 64 MT-32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Turion 64 MT-32's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 versus 1.79 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-32 — a 52.7% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 scores 475 against the Turion 64 MT-32's 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Turion 64 MT-32. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Mobile Pentium 4 3.06	Turion 64 MT-32
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.07 GHz+72%	1.79 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	475	505+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.