Opteron 146 vs Pentium M 760

Opteron 146 vs Pentium M 760 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 146

1 / 1

505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 760

1 / 1

515

+2.0%

Atom N280

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 146 vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 146 vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 146

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 515).
❌229.6% higher power demand at 89W vs 27W.

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅+2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 27W instead of 89W, a 62W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 760 better than Opteron 146?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 146 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium M 760 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 760 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 760 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 146 vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 146

The Opteron 146 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $60.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 146 and Pentium M 760 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Opteron 146 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — identical boost frequencies. The Opteron 146 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 760 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 146 scores 505 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 760. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Opteron 146	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	505	515+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	240

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 146 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 760 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.