
Opteron 146

Xeon 3.06
Opteron 146 vs Xeon 3.06 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron 146 vs Xeon 3.06 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Opteron 146 vs Xeon 3.06: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron 146
2003Why buy it
- β Draws 89W instead of 97W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (505 vs 535).
Xeon 3.06
2003Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 3.06 better than Opteron 146?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 146 vs Xeon 3.06 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 146
The Opteron 146 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003β2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $60.

Xeon 3.06
The Xeon 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003β2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 146 and Xeon 3.06 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Opteron 146 versus 3.07 GHz on the Xeon 3.06 β a 42.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.06. The Opteron 146 uses the SledgeHammer (2003β2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Xeon 3.06 uses Gallatin (2003β2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 146 scores 505 against the Xeon 3.06's 535 β a 5.8% lead for the Xeon 3.06. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Opteron 146 vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.06.
| Feature | Opteron 146 | Xeon 3.06 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 3.07 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | SledgeHammer (2003β2005) | Gallatin (2003β2004) |
| PassMark | 505 | 535+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 146 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 3.06 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 146 | Xeon 3.06 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 940 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















