Opteron 246
Pentium M 760
Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 760 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron 246
2003Why buy it
- ✅+4.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌229.6% higher power demand at 89W vs 27W.
Pentium M 760
2005Why buy it
- ✅Draws 27W instead of 89W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (515 vs 538).
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 246 better than Pentium M 760?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Opteron 246
The Opteron 246 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 538 points. Launch price was $109.
Pentium M 760
The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 246 and Pentium M 760 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Opteron 246 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — identical boost frequencies. The Opteron 246 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 760 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 246 scores 538 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 4.4% lead for the Opteron 246. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 246 | Pentium M 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 90 nm-31% |
| Architecture | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 538+4% | 515 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 240 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 246 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 760 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 246 | Pentium M 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 940 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Primary use case: Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.
| Feature | Opteron 246 | Pentium M 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 246 and Pentium M 760
