Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 246

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 246 Performance Spectrum

Celeron SU2300

545

+1.3%

538

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 246 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 246: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 89W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 246, which brings 1 cores / 1 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Opteron 246 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 246

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 1 cores / 1 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron SU2300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (538 vs 545).
❌790% higher power demand at 89W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron SU2300 better than Opteron 246?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 246 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron SU2300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron SU2300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron SU2300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron SU2300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2003). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 246 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 246

The Opteron 246 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 538 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 246 is built on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Opteron 246's 538 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 0 kB on the Opteron 246.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Opteron 246
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	—	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark	545+1%	538

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 246 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.