Athlon II Neo K145 vs Celeron SU2300

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Celeron SU2300 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II Neo K145

1 / 1

565

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron SU2300

545

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Celeron SU2300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Celeron SU2300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K145

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 177.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 565).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 10W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II Neo K145 better than Celeron SU2300?

Yes. Athlon II Neo K145 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.7% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II Neo K145 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 3.7% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K145 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II Neo K145 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K145 comes in $84 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.7% higher PassMark. It is also 177.8% better value on MSRP (11.3 vs 4.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II Neo K145 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Celeron SU2300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II Neo K145 is built on the Nile (2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 3.6% lead for the Athlon II Neo K145.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K145	Celeron SU2300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Nile (2010)	—
PassMark	565+4%	545

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K145	Celeron SU2300
Socket	S1	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II Neo K145 was priced at $50, while the Celeron SU2300 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($50 vs $134), Athlon II Neo K145 was $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II Neo K145 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 4.1 pts/$ for the Celeron SU2300 — making the Athlon II Neo K145 the 94.1% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K145	Celeron SU2300
MSRP	$50-63%	$134
Performance per Dollar	11.3+176%	4.1
Release Date	2010	2009

Search Athlon II Neo K145 on Amazon

Search Celeron SU2300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.