Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 780

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 780 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II Neo K145

1 / 1

565

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 780

1 / 1

575

+1.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 780 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K145

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 27W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (565 vs 575).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Pentium M 780 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium M 780

2005

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌2600% higher power demand at 27W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II Neo K145 better than Pentium M 780?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II Neo K145 is ahead with 5900% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 780 pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 780 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II Neo K145 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K145 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5900% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Pentium M 780 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II Neo K145 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 780 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Pentium M 780 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 — a 193.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II Neo K145. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium M 780 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Pentium M 780's 575 — a 1.8% lead for the Pentium M 780.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K145	Pentium M 780
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+5900%	0.03 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	Nile (2010)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	565	575+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 780 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 780 — the Athlon II Neo K145 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II Neo K145) vs 16 (Pentium M 780) — the Pentium M 780 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB2 (Athlon II Neo K145) and 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 780).

Feature	Athlon II Neo K145	Pentium M 780
Socket	S1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+100%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16