Athlon II Neo K145
Opteron 148
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 148 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 148 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II Neo K145
2010Why buy it
- ✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 85W, a 84W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Opteron 148 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 148
2005Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (548 vs 565).
- ❌8400% higher power demand at 85W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II Neo K145 better than Opteron 148?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 148 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II Neo K145
The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.
Opteron 148
The Opteron 148 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 548 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Opteron 148 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 148 — a 20% clock advantage for the Opteron 148. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Opteron 148 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Opteron 148's 548 — a 3.1% lead for the Athlon II Neo K145.
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K145 | Opteron 148 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm-65% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Nile (2010) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 565+3% | 548 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 148 uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K145 | Opteron 148 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II Neo K145 and Opteron 148
