Athlon II Neo K145
Opteron 248
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 248 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 248 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Civilization VI
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 248: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II Neo K145
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 248 across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (565 vs 585).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Opteron 248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 248
2003Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 248 better than Athlon II Neo K145?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 248 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II Neo K145
The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.
Opteron 248
The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Opteron 248 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 — a 20% clock advantage for the Opteron 248. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Opteron 248 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Opteron 248's 585 — a 3.5% lead for the Opteron 248.
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K145 | Opteron 248 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm-65% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Nile (2010) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 565 | 585+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 248 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K145 | Opteron 248 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | 940 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II Neo K145 and Opteron 248
