Athlon II Neo K145
VS
Opteron 248

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Opteron 248

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Opteron 248

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II Neo K145 is positioned at rank 1048 and the Opteron 248 is on rank 726, so the Opteron 248 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K145

#1035
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2596%
#1036
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2558%
#1037
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2349%
#1038
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2338%
#1039
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2317%
#1041
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2237%
#1042
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2145%
#1043
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2142%
#1044
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2084%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
100%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
98%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
98%
#1053
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1055
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
96%
#1056
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
96%
#1057
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
95%
#1058
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
94%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
94%
#1060
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
94%
#1061
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1062
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 248

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14205%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2682%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2383%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1841%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
100%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
99%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
99%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
99%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
98%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
98%
#726
Opteron 248
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#728
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
100%
#730
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#738
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon II Neo K145 (2010) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon II Neo K145Opteron 248
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Nile (2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 248 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon II Neo K145Opteron 248
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II Neo K145 and Opteron 248

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Opteron 248

The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Opteron 248 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 — a 20% clock advantage for the Opteron 248. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Opteron 248 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Opteron 248's 585 — a 3.5% lead for the Opteron 248.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Opteron 248
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.2 GHz+22%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
Nile (2010)
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark
565
585+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 248 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Opteron 248
Socket
S1
940
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0