Athlon II Neo K145
VS
Core Duo T2050

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Core Duo T2050

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2050

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II Neo K145 is positioned at rank 1048 and the Core Duo T2050 is on rank 86, so the Core Duo T2050 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K145

#1035
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2596%
#1036
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2558%
#1037
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2349%
#1038
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2338%
#1039
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2317%
#1041
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2237%
#1042
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2145%
#1043
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2142%
#1044
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2084%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
100%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
98%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
98%
#1053
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1055
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
96%
#1056
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
96%
#1057
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
95%
#1058
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
94%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
94%
#1060
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
94%
#1061
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1062
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2050

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
93%
#74
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
251%
#75
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
247%
#76
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
227%
#77
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
226%
#78
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
224%
#80
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
216%
#81
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
207%
#82
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
207%
#83
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
201%
#86
Core Duo T2050
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
99%
#98
N150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $128
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II Neo K145 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Duo T2050 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II Neo K145Core Duo T2050
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Nile (2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II Neo K145Core Duo T2050
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II Neo K145 and Core Duo T2050

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core Duo T2050

The Core Duo T2050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Athlon II Neo K145 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core Duo T2050 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core Duo T2050 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 1.6 GHz on the Core Duo T2050 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II Neo K145. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Duo T2050 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Core Duo T2050's 585 — a 3.5% lead for the Core Duo T2050.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Core Duo T2050
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+12%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Nile (2010)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
565
585+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2050 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Core Duo T2050
Socket
S1
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0