Athlon II Neo K145 vs Turion 64 ML-37

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Turion 64 ML-37 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II Neo K145

1 / 1

565

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 ML-37

1 / 1

555

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Turion 64 ML-37 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Turion 64 ML-37: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K145

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-37 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 ML-37

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (555 vs 565).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II Neo K145 better than Turion 64 ML-37?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion 64 ML-37 is ahead with 11.1% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K145 pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K145 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II Neo K145 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K145 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion 64 ML-37 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 11.1% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II Neo K145 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Turion 64 ML-37 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 ML-37

The Turion 64 ML-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Turion 64 ML-37 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-37 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-37. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-37 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Turion 64 ML-37's 555 — a 1.8% lead for the Athlon II Neo K145.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K145	Turion 64 ML-37
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	Nile (2010)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	565+2%	555

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-37 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.