Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 150

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 150 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II Neo K145

1 / 1

565

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Sempron 150

1 / 1

579

+2.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K145

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (565 vs 579).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Sempron 150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 150

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 150 better than Athlon II Neo K145?

Yes. Sempron 150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 150 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 61.1% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 150 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.5% higher PassMark. Athlon II Neo K145 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

Sempron 150

The Sempron 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 579 points. Launch price was $73.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Sempron 150 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 2.9 GHz on the Sempron 150 — a 46.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 150. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 150 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Sempron 150's 579 — a 2.4% lead for the Sempron 150.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K145	Sempron 150
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+61%
Base Clock	—	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (per core)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Nile (2010)	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	565	579+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 150 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.