Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 3800+
Celeron SU2300
Sempron 3800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron SU2300 is positioned at rank 1223 and the Sempron 3800+ is on rank 853, so the Sempron 3800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron SU2300 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Manila (2001−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron SU2300 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron SU2300 and Sempron 3800+
Celeron SU2300
The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 3800+
The Sempron 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 528 points. Launch price was $21.
Processing Power
The Sempron 3800+ is built on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Sempron 3800+'s 528 — a 3.2% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 3800+.
| Feature | Celeron SU2300 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-50% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | — | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 545+3% | 528 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron SU2300 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron SU2300 and Sempron 3800+
