Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 3800+

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 3800+ Performance Spectrum

Celeron SU2300

545

+3.2%

528

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 3800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 3800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 62W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Sempron 3800+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 3800+

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron SU2300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (528 vs 545).
❌520% higher power demand at 62W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron SU2300 better than Sempron 3800+?

Yes. Celeron SU2300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron SU2300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron SU2300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron SU2300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 3800+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 3800+

The Sempron 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 528 points. Launch price was $21.

⚡

Processing Power

The Sempron 3800+ is built on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Sempron 3800+'s 528 — a 3.2% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 3800+.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Sempron 3800+
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	256 kB
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	—	Manila (2001−2006)
PassMark	545+3%	528

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.