Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 145

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 145 Performance Spectrum

Celeron SU2300

545

+0.2%

544

0.0%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2700+

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Athlon 64 3100+

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 145 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 145: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 45W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Sempron 145 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 145

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (544 vs 545).
❌350% higher power demand at 45W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron SU2300 better than Sempron 145?

Yes. Celeron SU2300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron SU2300 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 0.2% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron SU2300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 145 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron SU2300 vs Sempron 145 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 145

The Sempron 145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 544 points. Launch price was $95.

⚡

Processing Power

The Sempron 145 is built on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Sempron 145's 544 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 145.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Sempron 145
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	—	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	545	544

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 145 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.