Celeron SU2300 vs Turion 64 ML-37
Celeron SU2300
Turion 64 ML-37
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron SU2300 is positioned at rank 1223 and the Turion 64 ML-37 is on rank 913, so the Turion 64 ML-37 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-37
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron SU2300 | Turion 64 ML-37 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron SU2300 | Turion 64 ML-37 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron SU2300 and Turion 64 ML-37
Celeron SU2300
The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Turion 64 ML-37
The Turion 64 ML-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Turion 64 ML-37 is built on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Turion 64 ML-37's 555 — a 1.8% lead for the Turion 64 ML-37. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-37.
| Feature | Celeron SU2300 | Turion 64 ML-37 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm-50% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | — | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 545 | 555+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-37 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron SU2300 | Turion 64 ML-37 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron SU2300 and Turion 64 ML-37
