Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 148

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 148 Performance Spectrum

Celeron SU2300

545

0.0%

548

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 148 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 85W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 548).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 148, which brings 1 cores / 1 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Opteron 148 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 148

2005

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 1 cores / 1 threads.

Trade-offs

❌750% higher power demand at 85W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 148 better than Celeron SU2300?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 148 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron SU2300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 148 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 0.6% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 148 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 148 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Opteron 148 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% higher PassMark. Celeron SU2300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron SU2300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron SU2300 vs Opteron 148 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 148

The Opteron 148 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 548 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 148 is built on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Opteron 148's 548 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 148. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 0 kB on the Opteron 148.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Opteron 148
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.2 GHz+83%
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	—	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark	545	548

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 148 uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.