Celeron SU2300
VS
Xeon 3.20

Celeron SU2300 vs Xeon 3.20

VS
Intel

Xeon 3.20

1 Cores1 Thrd97 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron SU2300 is positioned at rank 1223 and the Xeon 3.20 is on rank 1030, so the Xeon 3.20 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300

#1211
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7209%
#1212
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7103%
#1213
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6521%
#1214
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6491%
#1215
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6432%
#1217
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6211%
#1218
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5956%
#1219
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5946%
#1220
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5786%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
100%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
99%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
96%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
#1231
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
82%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
69%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
58%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
53%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
51%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.20

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
305622%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
57704%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
51268%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
39606%
#1029
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
100%
#1030
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
100%
#1031
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
66%
#1032
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
41%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron SU2300 (2009) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron SU2300Xeon 3.20
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon 3.20 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron SU2300Xeon 3.20
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1314%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron SU2300 and Xeon 3.20

Intel

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon 3.20

The Xeon 3.20 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon 3.20 is built on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Xeon 3.20's 575 — a 5.4% lead for the Xeon 3.20. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.20.

FeatureCeleron SU2300Xeon 3.20
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
Gallatin (2003−2004)
PassMark
545
575+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 3.20 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron SU2300Xeon 3.20
Socket
BGA956
PGA604
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron SU2300 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Xeon 3.20 debuted at $851. At current prices ($134 vs $10), the Xeon 3.20 is $124 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron SU2300 delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 57.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 3.20 — making the Xeon 3.20 the 173.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron SU2300Xeon 3.20
MSRP
$134-84%
$851
Avg Price (30d)
$134
$10-93%
Performance per Dollar
4.1
57.5+1302%
Release Date
2009
2003