Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 770

AMD

Opteron 246

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 770

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.01 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 770 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 246

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 770 across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (538 vs 545).
    • 229.6% higher power demand at 89W vs 27W.

    Pentium M 770

    2005

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Draws 27W instead of 89W, a 62W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium M 770 better than Opteron 246?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 246 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium M 770 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.7% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium M 770 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium M 770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Opteron 246 vs Pentium M 770 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Opteron 246

    The Opteron 246 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 538 points. Launch price was $109.

    Intel

    Pentium M 770

    The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Opteron 246 and Pentium M 770 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Opteron 246 versus 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 — a 198% clock advantage for the Opteron 246. The Opteron 246 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 770 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 246 scores 538 against the Pentium M 770's 545 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium M 770. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureOpteron 246Pentium M 770
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz+19900%
    0.01 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.13 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    2 MB+100%
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    PassMark
    538
    545+1%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Opteron 246 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 770 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureOpteron 246Pentium M 770
    Socket
    940
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1