Opteron 3280
VS
Core i7-7560U

Opteron 3280 vs Core i7-7560U

AMD

Opteron 3280

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-7560U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3280 is positioned at rank 93 and the Core i7-7560U is on rank 786, so the Opteron 3280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3280

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2197%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
415%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
369%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
285%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
92%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
89%
#93
Opteron 3280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7560U

#774
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1170%
#775
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1153%
#776
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1059%
#777
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1054%
#778
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1044%
#780
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1008%
#781
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
967%
#782
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
965%
#783
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
939%
#786
Core i7-7560U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#795
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
98%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
#800
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-7560U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 3280Core i7-7560U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zurich (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 3280 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 3280Core i7-7560U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3280 and Core i7-7560U

AMD

Opteron 3280

The Opteron 3280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,783 points. Launch price was $229.

Intel

Core i7-7560U

The Core i7-7560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,760 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3280 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-7560U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3280 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 3280 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7560U — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7560U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Opteron 3280 uses the Zurich (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-7560U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3280 scores 3,783 against the Core i7-7560U's 3,760 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 3280. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3280 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7560U.

FeatureOpteron 3280Core i7-7560U
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+300%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+4%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zurich (2012)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,783
3,760
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3280 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-7560U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3280Core i7-7560U
Socket
AM3+
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
2133
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3280) / true (Core i7-7560U). The Core i7-7560U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the Opteron 3280 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7560U targets Mobile.

FeatureOpteron 3280Core i7-7560U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile