Opteron 3320 EE
VS
Atom C3538

Opteron 3320 EE vs Atom C3538

AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Atom C3538

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3320 EE is positioned at rank 282 and the Atom C3538 is on rank 389, so the Opteron 3320 EE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3320 EE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
818%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
727%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
562%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
99%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
98%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
98%
#282
Opteron 3320 EE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#283
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
100%
#293
Xeon E5-2643 v3
MSRP: $219|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3538

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5440%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1027%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
913%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
705%
#266
EPYC 7C13
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
100%
#267
Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A
99%
#268
Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1389
99%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
97%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
97%
#389
Atom C3538
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
97%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
97%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3538 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 3320 EEAtom C3538
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 3320 EE (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 3320 EEAtom C3538
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3320 EE and Atom C3538

AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Atom C3538

The Atom C3538 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 3320 EE and Atom C3538 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE versus 2.1 GHz on the Atom C3538 — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Opteron 3320 EE (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Opteron 3320 EE uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom C3538 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3320 EE scores 1,918 against the Atom C3538's 1,910 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 3320 EE. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3320 EE vs 8 MB on the Atom C3538.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EEAtom C3538
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+19%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB
8 MB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
1,918
1,910
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3320 EE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom C3538 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EEAtom C3538
Socket
AM3+
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12