Opteron 3320 EE
VS
Core i3-4158U

Opteron 3320 EE vs Core i3-4158U

AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-4158U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3320 EE is positioned at rank 282 and the Core i3-4158U is on rank 576, so the Opteron 3320 EE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3320 EE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
818%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
727%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
562%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
99%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
98%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
98%
#282
Opteron 3320 EE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#283
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
100%
#293
Xeon E5-2643 v3
MSRP: $219|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4158U

#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
100%
#564
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
764%
#565
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
752%
#566
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
691%
#567
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
688%
#568
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
681%
#570
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
658%
#571
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
631%
#572
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
630%
#573
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
613%
#576
Core i3-4158U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 3320 EE leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4158U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 3320 EECore i3-4158U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 3320 EECore i3-4158U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3320 EE and Core i3-4158U

AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i3-4158U

The Core i3-4158U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,921 points. Launch price was $315.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3320 EE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4158U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3320 EE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-4158U — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 3320 EE (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 3320 EE uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4158U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3320 EE scores 1,918 against the Core i3-4158U's 1,921 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-4158U. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3320 EE vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4158U.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EECore i3-4158U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+25%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)+167%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,918
1,921
Geekbench 6 Single
457
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3320 EE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4158U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EECore i3-4158U
Socket
AM3+
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3320 EE) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-4158U). The Core i3-4158U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the Opteron 3320 EE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4158U targets Multimedia.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EECore i3-4158U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Multimedia