Opteron 3320 EE
VS
Celeron M 575

Opteron 3320 EE vs Celeron M 575

AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron M 575

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3320 EE is positioned at rank 282 and the Celeron M 575 is on rank 827, so the Opteron 3320 EE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3320 EE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
818%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
727%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
562%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
99%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
98%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
98%
#282
Opteron 3320 EE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#283
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
100%
#293
Xeon E5-2643 v3
MSRP: $219|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 575

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1316%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1297%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1191%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1185%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1174%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1134%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1087%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1086%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1057%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#828
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 3320 EE delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M 575 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightOpteron 3320 EECeleron M 575
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($12)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 3320 EECeleron M 575
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($12)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3320 EE and Celeron M 575

AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3320 EE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 575 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Opteron 3320 EE has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 3320 EE. The Opteron 3320 EE uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 575 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3320 EE scores 1,918 against the Celeron M 575's 1,917 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 3320 EE.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EECeleron M 575
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+300%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+25%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+300%
1 MB
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,918
1,917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3320 EE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 575 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EECeleron M 575
Socket
AM3+
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
4
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3320 EE) / false (Celeron M 575). Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

FeatureOpteron 3320 EECeleron M 575
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false