Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon X6550

Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon X6550 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 3320 EE

4 / 4

1,918

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X6550

1,936

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon X6550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon X6550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 3320 EE

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X6550 across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,918 vs 1,936).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).

Xeon X6550

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X6550 better than Opteron 3320 EE?

Yes. Xeon X6550 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X6550 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 21 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X6550 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X6550 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X6550 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 3320 EE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon X6550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X6550

The Xeon X6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,936 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 3320 EE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X6550 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X6550 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X6550 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 3320 EE (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 3320 EE is built on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Opteron 3320 EE scores 1,918 against the Xeon X6550's 1,936 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon X6550. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3320 EE vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X6550.

Feature	Opteron 3320 EE	Xeon X6550
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	18 MB L3 Cache+125%
L2 Cache	4096 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Delhi (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	1,918	1,936

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3320 EE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X6550 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 3320 EE	Xeon X6550
Socket	AM3+	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3320 EE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X6550). Primary use case: Xeon X6550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X6550 rivals Core i7-980X.