Opteron 3350 HE
VS
Celeron J4115

Opteron 3350 HE vs Celeron J4115

AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron J4115

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Opteron 3350 HE is positioned at rank #155 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3350 HE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3080%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
581%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
517%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
399%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
99%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
98%
#155
Opteron 3350 HE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#168
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
MSRP: $110|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4115 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 3350 HECeleron J4115
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Gemini Lake (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 3350 HE (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 3350 HECeleron J4115
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3350 HE and Celeron J4115

AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

The Opteron 3350 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,699 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 3350 HE and Celeron J4115 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 3350 HE versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 — a 41.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 3350 HE (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Opteron 3350 HE uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J4115 uses Gemini Lake (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3350 HE scores 2,699 against the Celeron J4115's 2,688 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 3350 HE. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3350 HE vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4115.

FeatureOpteron 3350 HECeleron J4115
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+52%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+56%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB
4 MB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Gemini Lake (2019)
PassMark
2,699
2,688
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3350 HE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J4115 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3350 HECeleron J4115
Socket
AM3+
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3350 HE) / true (Celeron J4115). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Opteron 3350 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureOpteron 3350 HECeleron J4115
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true