Opteron 3350 HE vs Xeon E5-2603 v2

Opteron 3350 HE vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 3350 HE

4 / 4

2,699

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2603 v2

4 / 4

2,735

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 3350 HE vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 3350 HE vs Xeon E5-2603 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 3350 HE

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2603 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,699 vs 2,735).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-2603 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2603 v2 better than Opteron 3350 HE?

Yes. Xeon E5-2603 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2603 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2603 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2603 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2603 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2603 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 3350 HE vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 3350 HE

The Opteron 3350 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,699 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2603 v2

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,735 points. Launch price was $240.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 3350 HE and Xeon E5-2603 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 3350 HE versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 — a 71.4% clock advantage for the Opteron 3350 HE (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Opteron 3350 HE uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3350 HE scores 2,699 against the Xeon E5-2603 v2's 2,735 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2603 v2. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3350 HE vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603 v2.

Feature	Opteron 3350 HE	Xeon E5-2603 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+111%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+56%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Delhi (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	2,699	2,735+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3350 HE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.