Opteron 3350 HE
VS
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Opteron 3350 HE vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3350 HE is positioned at rank 155 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is on rank 638, so the Opteron 3350 HE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3350 HE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3080%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
581%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
517%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
399%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
99%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
98%
#155
Opteron 3350 HE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#168
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
MSRP: $110|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1400

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
99%
#626
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
861%
#627
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
849%
#628
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
779%
#629
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
776%
#630
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
769%
#632
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
742%
#633
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
712%
#634
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
711%
#635
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
691%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 3350 HE leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 3350 HECeleron Dual-Core T1400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2M (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 3350 HECeleron Dual-Core T1400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3350 HE and Celeron Dual-Core T1400

AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

The Opteron 3350 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,699 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3350 HE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Opteron 3350 HE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 3350 HE versus 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — a 74.9% clock advantage for the Opteron 3350 HE. The Opteron 3350 HE uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3350 HE scores 2,699 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1400's 2,725 — a 1% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

FeatureOpteron 3350 HECeleron Dual-Core T1400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+120%
1.73 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512 kB
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark
2,699
2,725
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3350 HE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3350 HECeleron Dual-Core T1400
Socket
AM3+
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3350 HE) / No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.

FeatureOpteron 3350 HECeleron Dual-Core T1400
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget