Opteron 3365
VS
Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Opteron 3365 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G

AMD

Opteron 3365

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Opteron 3365 is positioned at rank #83 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3365

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2015%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
380%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
338%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
261%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
99%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
98%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
96%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
84%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
82%
#83
Opteron 3365
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#85
Opteron 6234
MSRP: $377|Avg: $141
99%
#86
Xeon E7330
MSRP: $64|Avg: $60
98%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
96%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1606G (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 3365Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 3365 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 3365Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3365 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G

AMD

Opteron 3365

The Opteron 3365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3365 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3365 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 3365 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Opteron 3365 uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3365 scores 4,125 against the Ryzen Embedded R1606G's 4,162 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3365 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

FeatureOpteron 3365Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+300%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
4,125
4,162
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3365 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3365Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Socket
AM3+
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0