Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2

Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 3365

8 / 8

4,125

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-1607 v2

4 / 4

4,141

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 3365

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,125 vs 4,141).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1607 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 3365 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Opteron 3365 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1607 v2 better than Opteron 3365?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 3365 is ahead with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 v2 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon E5-1607 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1607 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-1607 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $250 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 3365 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1607 v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 3365

The Opteron 3365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-1607 v2

The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 3365 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3365 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 3365 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Opteron 3365 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Opteron 3365 uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3365 scores 4,125 against the Xeon E5-1607 v2's 4,141 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3365 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2.

Feature	Opteron 3365	Xeon E5-1607 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	4 MB	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Delhi (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark	4,125	4,141

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3365 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.