Opteron 3380
VS
Core i3-6320

Opteron 3380 vs Core i3-6320

AMD

Opteron 3380

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-6320

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3380 is positioned at rank 79 and the Core i3-6320 is on rank 630, so the Opteron 3380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3380

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1908%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
360%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
320%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
247%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
99%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
94%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
93%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
91%
#79
Opteron 3380
MSRP: $229|Avg: $427
100%
#82
Xeon W-10855M
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
95%
#85
Opteron 6234
MSRP: $377|Avg: $141
93%
#86
Xeon E7330
MSRP: $64|Avg: $60
93%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
91%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11282%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10660%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7740%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2332%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1847%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1616%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
925%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
913%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
832%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
832%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
822%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
800%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
789%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
786%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
779%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
100%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
100%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
100%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 3380 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-6320 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 3380Core i3-6320
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($427)
More affordable ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-6320 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 92% cheaper ($35 vs $427) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightOpteron 3380Core i3-6320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1138%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($427)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3380 and Core i3-6320

AMD

Opteron 3380

The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i3-6320

The Core i3-6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,421 points. Launch price was $157.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3380 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-6320 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3380 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 3380 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-6320 — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i3-6320 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Opteron 3380 uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6320 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3380 scores 4,358 against the Core i3-6320's 4,421 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-6320. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3380 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-6320.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i3-6320
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+300%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
4,358
4,421+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,853
Geekbench 6 Single
1,311
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,730
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3380 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-6320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i3-6320
Socket
AM3+
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3380) / Yes (Core i3-6320). The Core i3-6320 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Opteron 3380 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i3-6320
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 530
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Opteron 3380 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Core i3-6320 debuted at $160. At current prices ($427 vs $35), the Core i3-6320 is $392 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 3380 delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 126.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-6320 — making the Core i3-6320 the 170.1% better value option.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i3-6320
MSRP
$229
$160-30%
Avg Price (30d)
$427
$35-92%
Performance per Dollar
10.2
126.3+1138%
Release Date
2012
2015